linear-sop
>
pinned to #a10f722updated 2 weeks ago
Ask your AI client: “install skills/linear-sop”.
Requires the metahub MCP server installed in your client. Set up MCP.
mh install skills/linear-sopmetahub onboarded this repo on the author's behalf.
If you own github.com/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow on GitHub, claim the listing to take over publishing. Your claim preserves the existing eval history and badges; only the curator label is replaced with verified-publisher on your next publish.
Stars
363
Last commit
2 weeks ago
Latest release
published
- #agile-methodology
- #ai-agents
- #ai-assisted-development
- #claude-code
- #commands
- #dark-factory
- #developer-tools
- #evidence-based-development
- #harness
- #hooks
- #methodology
- #multi-agent
- #safe-framework
- #scaled-agile-framework
- #skills
- #software-development
- #software-engineering
- #task-orchestration
- #whitepaper
About this skill
Pulled from SKILL.md at publish time.
> **TEMPLATE**: This skill uses `{{PLACEHOLDER}}` tokens. Replace with your project values before use.
Evaluation report
WarningsAutomated checks the publisher passed at publish time — structure, docs, safety, and whether the artifact behaves as claimed.a10f722· 2 weeks ago
Documentation
41Description qualitywarn
36 words · 251 chars — manifest description is empty; graded the GitHub repo description instead
A skill's manifest description doubles as its trigger — add one to SKILL.md (15+ words, e.g. “use this skill when …”).
README is present and substantial
69,138 chars · 18 sections · 28 code blocks
Tags / topics declared
19 total — agile-methodology, ai-agents, ai-assisted-development, claude-code, commands, dark-factory (+13)
README has usage / example sections
found: Quick Start · Getting Started · Installation
Homepage / docs URL declared
https://jscottgraham.us
Release history
1- releasecurrenta10f722warn2 weeks ago
Contents
TEMPLATE: This skill uses
{{PLACEHOLDER}}tokens. Replace with your project values before use.
Purpose
Guide consistent ticket management. Provides evidence templates for the mandatory dev/staging/UAT evidence policy.
When This Skill Applies
- Creating new issues in the ticket system
- Updating ticket status
- Attaching evidence to tickets
- Parsing acceptance criteria
- Working with UUIDs and issue IDs
Ticket System Operations
Reading Issues
# Get issue by identifier
get_issue({ id: "{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-459" })
# List issues with filters
list_issues({
team: "{{PROJECT_TEAM_NAME}}",
state: "In Progress",
assignee: "me",
})
Creating Issues
create_issue({
title: "feat(scope): description",
team: "{{PROJECT_TEAM_NAME}}",
description: "## Summary\n\n...",
labels: ["feature", "sprint-1"],
parentId: "parent-uuid", // Optional - for sub-issues
})
Updating Issues
update_issue({
id: "{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-459",
state: "Done",
})
Adding Comments
create_comment({
issueId: "{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-459",
body: "**Dev Evidence**\n\n...",
})
Evidence Policy (MUST)
Every issue requires evidence at each phase:
| Phase | Required? | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Dev | MUST | Implementation proof |
| Staging | MUST | UAT validation (or N/A) |
| Done | MUST | Final verification |
Evidence Templates
Dev Evidence Template
**Dev Evidence**
**PR**: https://github.com/{{ORG_NAME}}/{{REPO_NAME}}/pull/XXX
**Commit**: [short-hash]
**Branch**: {{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX-description
**Implementation:**
- [x] Feature implemented
- [x] Tests passing
- [x] Lint passing
**Verification:**
{{CI_VALIDATE_COMMAND}}
# Output: All checks passed
Staging/UAT Evidence Template
**Staging Evidence**
**Environment**: {{STAGING_ENV_NAME}}
**URL**: {{STAGING_URL}}
**Validation Steps:**
1. Deployed to staging: [timestamp]
2. Smoke test passed: [yes/no]
3. Feature verified: [description]
**UAT Status:** [Passed/Pending/N/A]
If N/A, reason: [e.g., "Dev tooling only - no user-facing changes"]
Done Evidence Template
**Done Evidence**
**PR Merged**: https://github.com/{{ORG_NAME}}/{{REPO_NAME}}/pull/XXX
**Merge Commit**: [hash]
**Final Checklist:**
- [x] All acceptance criteria met
- [x] Documentation updated (if applicable)
- [x] No regressions detected
Acceptance Criteria Parsing
When reading issue descriptions, extract ACs:
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] User can perform action X
- [ ] System responds with Y
- [ ] Error handling for Z
Convert to testable checklist for verification.
Status Workflow
Backlog -> Ready -> In Progress -> Testing -> Ready for Review -> Done
GitHub-Linear Auto-Sync
Tickets referenced in commit messages (e.g., [{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-123]) automatically move to Done when the PR merges. Child stories not referenced in any commit message must be manually closed after merge.
Best practice: Reference Feature-level tickets in commit messages. After merge, manually close orphaned child stories that were not referenced.
Status Update Guidelines
| From | To | When |
|---|---|---|
| Backlog | Ready | Sprint planning |
| Ready | In Progress | Work starts |
| In Progress | Testing | PR created |
| Testing | Ready for Review | Tests pass, UAT complete |
| Ready for Review | Done | POPM approval or auto-sync via PR |
UUID Handling
Most ticket systems use UUIDs internally. When working with APIs:
// Issue identifiers (human-readable)
const issueId = "{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-459";
// UUIDs (API operations)
const uuid = "ef6a5fa0-2b46-417f-8266-dea2d187b10a";
// Get UUID from identifier via API
// Returns issue object with .id property containing UUID
Common Operations
Link PR to Issue
PRs are automatically linked when:
- Branch name contains
{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX - PR title contains
[{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX]
Create Sub-Issue
create_issue({
title: "Sub-task description",
team: "{{PROJECT_TEAM_NAME}}",
parentId: "parent-issue-uuid",
})
Query by Label
list_issues({
label: "sprint-1",
team: "{{PROJECT_TEAM_NAME}}",
})
Authoritative References
- Agent Workflow SOP:
docs/sop/AGENT_WORKFLOW_SOP.md - CONTRIBUTING.md: Workflow documentation
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first.
Related
orchestration-patterns
>
migration-patterns
>
deployment-sop
>
mh install skills/linear-sop