designing-experiments
Design experiments and quasi-experiments before analysis. Use when choosing study design, treatment/control structure, outcomes, assumptions, validation plans after scientific experiment failure, or which of DiD, ITS, synthetic control, or regression discontinuity fits the research question. For fitting models or estimating effects on existing data, use performing-causal-analysis instead.
pinned to #34429a8updated 2 weeks ago
Ask your AI client: “install skills/designing-experiments”.
Requires the metahub MCP server installed in your client. Set up MCP.
mh install skills/designing-experimentsmetahub onboarded this repo on the author's behalf.
If you own github.com/foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills on GitHub, claim the listing to take over publishing. Your claim preserves the existing eval history and badges; only the curator label is replaced with verified-publisher on your next publish.
Stars
2,381
Last commit
2 weeks ago
Latest release
published
- #agent-framework
- #agent-skills
- #agentic-coding
- #ai-agents
- #ai-scientist
- #ai-skills
- #ai-workflow
- #automation
- #claude-code
- #codex
- #context-engineering
- #developer-tools
- #llm
- #multi-agent
- #prompt-engineering
- #skills
- #vibe-coding
- #vibecoding
- #workflow-automation
About this skill
Pulled from SKILL.md at publish time.
Helps choose and specify a research design before data analysis starts. This skill owns study-design decisions: what is treated, what is compared, what outcome is measured, which assumptions are required, which validation or recovery experiment should follow a failed scientific experiment, and which design is defensible.
Evaluation report
WarningsAutomated checks the publisher passed at publish time — structure, docs, safety, and whether the artifact behaves as claimed.34429a8· 2 weeks ago
Documentation
22Description quality
47 words · 391 chars — "Design experiments and quasi-experiments before analysis. Use when choosing stud…"
README is present and substantialwarn
README present but its contents couldn't be read this scan
Transient fetch issue — re-run the eval to grade the README's substance.
Tags / topics declaredwarn
No manifest tags and no GitHub repo topics
Add tags to the manifest (or GitHub topics on the repo) so the registry's search and category filters surface this artifact.
Homepage / docs URL declared
no homepage declared (registry will use the repo URL) — info-only, not blocking
Release history
1- releasecurrent34429a8warn2 weeks ago
Contents
Helps choose and specify a research design before data analysis starts. This skill owns study-design decisions: what is treated, what is compared, what outcome is measured, which assumptions are required, which validation or recovery experiment should follow a failed scientific experiment, and which design is defensible.
It does not fit causal models, estimate treatment effects, interpret fitted model output from existing data, or debug software/build failures.
Decision Framework
-
Control Group?
- Yes: Go to Step 2.
- No: Consider Interrupted Time Series (ITS).
-
Unit Structure?
- Single Treated Unit:
- With multiple controls: Synthetic Control (SC).
- No controls: ITS.
- Multiple Treated Units:
- With control group: Difference-in-Differences (DiD).
- Single Treated Unit:
-
Time Structure?
- Panel Data (Multiple units over time): Required for DiD and SC.
- Time Series (Single unit over time): Required for ITS.
Method Quick Reference
- Difference-in-Differences (DiD): Compares trend changes between treated and control groups. Assumes Parallel Trends.
- Interrupted Time Series (ITS): Analyzes trend/level change for a single unit after intervention. Assumes Trend Continuity.
- Synthetic Control (SC): Constructs a synthetic counterfactual from weighted control units. Assumes Convex Hull (treated unit within range of controls).
Failed Experiment Recovery
When a scientific experiment or optimization plan produces weak or contradictory results, use the same design surface to:
- Separate implementation or measurement errors from design-assumption failures.
- Identify which assumption should be tested next.
- Define a minimal validation experiment before abandoning the approach.
- State the decision rule for continuing, revising, or stopping the line of work.
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first.
Related
orchestration-patterns
>
migration-patterns
>
deployment-sop
>
mh install skills/designing-experiments